Legal Opinion

Alcaraz v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 2002No. 01-33PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[T1] Dominic Alcaraz stole money from his employer and was convicted of felony larceny. The district court ordered him to pay $5,617.35 in restitution to compensate the employer for the total cost of a surveillance system which was installed to investigate the thefts. Mr. Alcaraz appealed claiming the district court abused its discretion by ordering him to pay for the entire system. We agree and reverse and remand for a determination of what portion of the total cost of the system can reasonably be required as restitution when the standard herein set forth is applied.

ISSUES

[T2]…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cross v. Berg Lumber CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Buckley v. BellWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. O'S Gold Seed Co. v. United Agri-Products Financial Services, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hampton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In the Interest of KP v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. TPJ v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Winter v. PleasantWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. ReyesColorado Court of Appeals · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API