Legal Opinion

Mansoor Khan v. Unum Group f/k/a Unum Provident Corporation; Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company

District Court, D. Montana

Decided October 31, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00042Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION MANSOOR KHAN, CV 24-42-BLG-SPW-TJC Plaintiff, ORDER vs. UNUM GROUP f/k/a UNUM PROVIDENT CORPORATION; PROVIDENT LIFE and ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. Pending before the Court are: (1) Defendants Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company and Unum Group’s (“Defendants”) Motion to Have Requests for Admissions Deemed Admitted and for Evidentiary Sanctions Under Rule 37(d) (Doc 40); (2) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 42); and (3) Plaintiff Mansoor Khan’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Enforce…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Oklahoma Federated Gold and Numismatics, Inc. v. Michael W. BlodgettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. Ramirez v. County of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Medicor, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  5. American Property Construction Company v. Sprenger Lang FoundationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API