Andrews v. Flour City Paper Box Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Defendant Flour City Paper Box Company appeals from an order denying it a new trial after a directed verdict for plaintiff. .
The action was upon a promissory note for $500, executed by defendant, payable to the order of J. E. Tlrwing & Son, duly indorsed by the payees and transferred to plaintiff before maturity in consideration of $190 then paid therefor. The defenses pleaded were that the consideration for the note had Avholly failed; that the title to the note was defective, having been negotiated in bad faith; and that plaintiff was not a holder in due course.
The first contention is that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shelling State Bank v. ClasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Veigel v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Midland National Bank v. Farmers Co-operative Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- United States Mortgage Co. v. Hotel Radisson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Bartels v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
3Cited by1 opinion
- Blomberg v. TrupukkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941