Legal Opinion

Barth v. Gorson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1956No. Appeal, 246PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,

Where the constitutionality of a zoning ordinance is questioned, should the procedure be in equity or by statute? The learned court below ruled that the statutory provisions must be strictly pursued and exclusively applied. An appeal followed.

Paul A. Barth, Jr., and wife, plaintiffs, are owners of a single dwelling and lot located on the northwest side of Knights Road, 652 feet southwest of the intersection of Knights and Byberry Roads, in the City of Philadelphia. The lot has a frontage on Knights Road of 75 feet and a depth of approximately 197 feet.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kelly v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Taylor v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. Sun Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Dougherty, Tr. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Jacobs v. FetzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania State Chamber of Commerce v. TorquatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Knup v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co. v. ClairtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Society Hill Civic Ass'n v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. King v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API