Legal Opinion
Pfaff Construction Co. v. Leonard
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 20, 1931No. 11209PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLemert, J.
The nature of plaintiff’s claim in the instant action is for damages because of the issuance of the- injunction. The question raised by the record before us is- whether or not the facts stated in plaintiff’s petition set forth a cause of action against the defendants. We observe among other averments made in the petition the following:
“By virtue of said restraining order this plaintiff and said Village and its officers were prevented from entering into said contract and this plaintiff was prevented from performing any of the work awarded to it by said Village of Mayfield Heights, Ohio, until…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Horsfield Construction, Inc. v. Dubuque CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Schull Construction Co. v. Board of Regents of EducationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- MacKinnon-parker, Inc. v. Lucas Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- State ex rel. Greiner v. Board of PurchaseOhio Court of Appeals · 1934