Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Washington
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 10, 2002No. 01-SP-685PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
This is one of several pending appeals from denials of habeas corpus petitions filed under D.C.Code § 16-1901 (2001) by prisoners convicted of D.C.Code offenses who are serving their sentences in state or federal institutions outside the District of Columbia and who seek to challenge decisions of the United States Parole Commission denying them parole. In some of these cases, motions judges have denied the petitions for lack of jurisdiction, while in others, such as the instant case, the judges have denied the petitions on their merits. The government argues that all…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Wilton Chatman-Bey v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Blair-Bey v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Steven Guerra v. Edwin Meese, IIICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Vasquez v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Glass v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Graham v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Doe v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Wilson v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Norris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.