Legal Opinion
Weinberger v. Piedmont Industries, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 8, 1983No. 80 Civ. 5143 (JES)Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Arthur Weinberger, a former employee of Piedmont Industries, Inc. (“Piedmont”), commenced this action against Piedmont Industries, Inc. Retirement Income Plan (the “Plan”), a qualified employee pension plan within the meaning of § 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and an employee benefit plan within the meaning of § 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1002 and Martin L. Morrow, Ar*343lene Morrow, E.F. Brent and William R. Jolly, individually and as members of the Plan’s Retirement Committee…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ralph Pompano v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc. And Revised Pension Plan of Michael Schiavone& Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Bruce A. Saunders v. Teamsters Local 639, Employees Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981