Legal Opinion

In re Karolevitz

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 18, 1955No. 1519PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

This is a companion case to In re Boyer, D.C., 130 F.Supp. 20. Many of the Court's observations in that case are applicable to the instant case, and need not be repeated.

The United States of America, herein referred to as petitioner, for the Farmers Home Administration, an agency thereof, seeks review of an order of the Referee in Bankruptcy dated June 8, 1954, assessing fees of the trustee and the Referee out of the proceeds of the *25sale of certain mortgaged property. In this instance, however, it appears that after adjudication but before a trustee had been appointed,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  2. In re BarberDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1899
  3. In Re La RoweDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1950
  4. In Re Stephen R. Jackson & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
  5. In re BoyerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Halux, Inc., D/B/A Midwestern Cultured Marble, Inc., Debtor. Northwestern National Bank of St. Paul v. Halux, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. In Re Bernhard Altmann International CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  3. In re BoyerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1955
  4. URS Holdings. v. John RipleyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
  5. URS Holdings. v. John RipleyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API