Legal Opinion
URS Holdings. v. John Ripley
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 9, 2022No. 2:17-cv-05398Unknown
1Opinion
Case 2:17-cv-05398-RSWL-AGR Document 425 Filed 05/09/22 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:10403 'O' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CV17-5398-RSWL-AGRx 12 AECOM ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, INC., ORDER re: 13 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S 14 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING v. 15 TO ESTABLISH ATTORNEYS’ FEES 16 GARY TOPOLEWSKI, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 Plaintiff AECOM Energy & Construction, Inc. 19 (“AECOM”) brought this Action for injunctive relief and 20 damages against Defendants Morrison Knudsen Corporation; 21 Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc.; Morrison-Knudsen 22…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Martin Gonzalez, Sr. v. City of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Josefina Cabrales v. County of Los Angeles Ronald BlackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.