Legal Opinion

Tapley v. Dill

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 14, 1949No. 40421PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Arthur Tapley and other collateral heirs of Valentine Tapley instituted this action against Mary H. Tapley, Caroline M. Dill and others to quiet and determine title to approximately 580 acres of land in Pike county, Missouri, and for partition. A change of venue was taken to the Ralls county circuit court. At the time the suit was instituted plaintiffs had information Caroline M. Dill was dead. After a trial to the court without a jury, the title was adjudged in Caroline M. Dill as sole owner in fee. Mary H. Tapley prosecutes this appeal. The case pivots upon the provisions of two active…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Gardner v. VanlandinghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. Deacon v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  3. Norman v. HortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. Eckle v. RylandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1947

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Creek v. Union Nat. Bank in Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. St. Louis Union Trust Company v. GreenoughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Thomas v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. Lehmann v. JanesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  5. Blue Ridge Bank and Trust Co. v. McFallMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API