Legal Opinion
State of NY v. Cedar Park Concrete Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 25, 1987No. 85 CIV 1887 (LBS), 86 CIV 8128 (LBS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
The State of New York initiated this antitrust litigation by filing complaints (85 Civ. 1887 and 86 Civ. 8128) in this Court against more than thirty named defendants, all alleged participants in a collusive bid-rigging and market allocation scheme which allegedly pervaded and still permeates the New York City market for “major reinforced-concrete superstructure construction work.” Cedar Park Amended Complaint, 85 Civ. 1887, Preliminary Statement. 1 Plaintiff seeks treble damages under section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15, and sections 340 and 342-b of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kashi v. GratsosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- George C. Frey Ready-Mixed Concrete, Inc. v. Pine Hill Concrete Mix Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- In re District AttorneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Bonanno Organized Crime Family of La Cosa NostraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- In Re NASDAQ Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Invamed, Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Moore U.S.A. Inc. v. Standard Register Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2001
- Continental Orthopedic Appliances, Inc. v. Health Insurance PlanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.