Christenson v. Town of Dollymount
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Justice.
The facts in this case can be stated briefly for the purpose of this decision. Plaintiff is the owner of a farm in Stevens county. He brought this action for damages and injunctive relief alleging that the three defendants, county of Stevens, township of Dollymount, which is located in county of Traverse, and county of Traverse, in the construction, repair, and maintenance of two highways bordering plaintiff’s farm, had diverted the flow of water from its natural course so as to cause it to overflow his land and cause injuries to his growing crops and land. The action was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BushSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Mehl v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Cooper v. Sanitary District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- Hjelm v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Schuchard v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stauffer Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968