Legal Opinion

Mathew Thompson v. Nye County Sheriff’s Department, Deputy Andrew Letchworth

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided March 10, 2026No. 2:25-cv-01714Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 Mathew Thompson, Case No. 2:25-cv-01714-JAD-DJA 6 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 Nye County Sheriff’s Department, Deputy 9 Andrew Letchworth, 10 Defendants. 11 12 Under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has requested 13 authority to proceed in forma pauperis (meaning, without paying the filing fee). (ECF No. 4). 14 Plaintiff has also moved to amend his complaint. (ECF No. 5). Because the Court finds that 15 Plaintiff’s application is complete, it grants the application to proceed in forma pauperis. The 16…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API