Legal Opinion

David M. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, D. Maine

Decided September 28, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00129Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE DAVID M., ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) No. 2:25-cv-00129-KFW ) FRANK BISIGNANO, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant ) MEMORANDUM DECISION1 The Plaintiff in this Social Security Disability and Supplemental Security Income appeal contends that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred by failing to (1) properly evaluate the opinion evidence and the Plaintiff’s own testimony and (2) resolve an apparent conflict between the vocational expert’s (VE’s) testimony and the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT). See Plaintiff’s Brief (ECF No.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. Hung NGUYEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. Jennifer Moore v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Seavey v. Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API