Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCall v. Automatic Voting MacH. Corporation

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 20, 1938No. 1 Div. 992Published

1DissentKnight, Justice

Bill in equity filed by the Automatic Voting Machine Corporation, appellee here, against the respondents, as the governing body of Mobile County, seeking a declaratory judgment as to the validity of the Act of the Legislature of Alabama approved September 2, 1935, Acts 1935, p. 679 et seq., known as the Douglass Act.

The bill is sufficient in averment to invoke the jurisdiction of the court to determine the issue involved. Nachman v. State Tax Commission, 233 Ala. 628, 173 So. 25; Houston County v. Martin, 232 Ala. 511, 169 So. 13; Teal et al. v. Mixon, 233 Ala. 23, 169 So. 477.

It appears that…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington, & Quincy Railroad v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Eckerson v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. State ex rel. Buford v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  5. Cooper v. RollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API