Lamb v. . Major
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil actioN, beard, and determined on case agreed, before O. H. Allen, J.3 at Eall Term, 1907, of the Superior Court of PerquimaNS County. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants excepted and appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Hoke, I.
Plaintiffs sued to recover $350 and interest, as the purchase price of standing timber on a certain tract of land in Perquimans County. Defendants admitted having entered into an obligation to pay plaintiffs that amount for the timber, provided a good title thereto could be made by plaintiffs, and resisted'recovery on the ground that no such title was forthcoming. Plaintiffs, having made formal tender of a deed conveying the timber to defendants, instituted the present action and recovered judgment.
The facts relevant to the inquiry, as set out in the case agreed, are as follows: “John…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Modlin v. Roanoke Railroad & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sullivan v. QuistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Gans & Klein Investment Co. v. SanfordMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Slorby v. SlorbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Whaley v. MatthewsNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Geray v. BertschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.