Legal Opinion

Sweet v. Swift

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Plaintiff, who is a transferee not holding any better title than his assignor, sued defendant on two alleged acceptances.

One A. E. Jackson, on March 1 and March 12, 1879, received from Matthias Kundinger two orders, payable to Jackson or bearer, for $35,14 and 816.12, addressed to Swift- & Lockwood, a firm of which defend ant was a member. They had an outstanding contract with Kundinger for the delivery of logs, which Kundinger had not performed. Jackson presented these orders, which were payable on demand, several times to Mr. Lockwood, who refused to honor them. In-June, 1879, Swift &…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. KempMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Bronson v. StetsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. First National Bank v. Lovell H. Turnbull Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API