Legal Opinion
City of Rochester v. Chiarella
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 11, 1984PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice John H. Doerr at the Appellate Division (98 AD2d 8) other than as it relates to the Statute of Limitations defense, that defense having been withdrawn. Question certified answered in the affirmative. We add that on this appeal the effect of the claims of nonprotestors on the right of protestors to full refund is not before us.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City of Rochester v. ChiarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by8 opinions
- LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. CHAUTAUQUA COUNTYAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Essex CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- City of Rochester v. ChiarellaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Michael v. Communications Workers of America AFL-CIONew York Supreme Court · 1985
- 1963 Elmwood Avenue, Inc. v. TanzellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.