Velasquez v. Franz
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
123 N.J. 498 (1991)
589 A.2d 143
JOSE VELASQUEZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
VERA FRANZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF LEYDEN HYDRAULICS, INC.; AND LEYDEN HYDRAULICS, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND CRIDGE, INC., AND NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued November 26, 1990.
Decided April 25, 1991.
Waldron Kraemer argued the cause for appellant (Kasen, Kraemer, Burns & Lovell, attorneys).
Stephen O. Mortenson argued the cause for respondent (Mortenson and Pomeroy, attorneys).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by GARIBALDI, J.
This case presents…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.