Legal Opinion

Judd v. Randall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 8, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Nobles county, where the action was tried by Perkins, J., without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

This action is for the recovery of damages for alleged breach of a covenant of seizin in a deed of conveyance from the defendants to the plaintiff. The important facts shown by the findings of the court are as follows:

In November, 1876, one Andrews entered the land as a homestead at the proper local land-office of the United States, the land being public land, subject to such entry. In November, 1878, two years after the entry, Andrews made final proof, as required by law, before the officers of the local land-office, and received the receiver’s final receipt, which was then recorded in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harkness v. UnderhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  2. Smith v. LloydMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Ames v. Mississippi Boom Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
  4. Hilmert v. ChristianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vantongeren v. HeffernanSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1888
  2. Harsin v. OmanWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Parsons v. VenzkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Swigart v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  5. Jones v. MeyersIdaho Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API