Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Teamsters Local Union No. 436 v. Board of County Commissioners
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 24, 2011No. 94703PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Larry A. Jones, Judge.
{¶ 1} Respondent-appellant, the Board of County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, Ohio (“BOCC”), appeals from the trial court’s decision to grant declaratory judgment in favor of relators-appellees, Teamsters Local Union No. 436 et al. Finding no merit to the appeal, we affirm.
{¶ 2} In November 2008, the BOCC passed a resolution authorizing eligible county employees to participate in an employee retirement-incentive plan (“ERIP”) in an effort to combat budgetary concerns. As written, the ERIP excluded only one county agency, the Sanitary Engineering Division (“SED”). The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State, Ex Rel. v. West LakeOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- State ex rel. Caspar v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. White v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Noernberg v. City of Brook ParkOhio Supreme Court · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Teamsters Local Union No. 436 v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Schneider v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017