Legal Opinion

The PEOPLE v. Ryan

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1962No. 36737PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daily

This appeal is prosecuted by Willis Ryan, an attorney, from a judgment of the county court of Douglas County which found him guilty of contempt and fined him $100 for his refusal to comply with an order of the court directing him, pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum, to produce a statement concerning an automobile accident which his client, Della Emberton, had given to her automobile insurer in compliance with the co-operation clause of the insurance policy. At the time of the order and refusal an information was on file in the county court charging Della Emberton with the offense of driving…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. People v. MundayIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. People v. GholsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  4. United States v. BoccutoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
  5. People v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. The People v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Monier v. ChamberlainIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Jost v. HillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  4. People v. RyanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  5. Bone v. BoneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API