Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 8, 1913No. 2170PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of forgery and his penalty fixed at six years in the penitentiary.

There is no statement of facts or bill of exceptions in the record. There is but one question raised which we can consider in the absence of a statement of facts, and that is the sufficiency of that count of the indictment under which appellant was convicted. There were two counts. Both were submitted under the charge of the court, but the jury acquitted the appellant under the first.

The statute is as follows: “Article 947. Every person who falsely makes, alters, forges or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mathews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Loggins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Lassiter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  5. Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hogue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Byrd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Figueroa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API