Legal Opinion
Ross v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 13, 1996No. 49A04-9506-CR-211PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Defendant-Appellant Enlow Ross (Ross) appeals following his conviction for rape, a Class A felony 1 ; and burglary, a Class B felony 2 .
We affirm.
ISSUES
Ross raises three issues for our review which we restate as follows:
1. Whether the State's DNA witness was properly qualified as an expert.
2. Whether the trial court erred by admitting a videotape of general DNA procedure.
3. Whether the manner in which the State exercised its peremptory challenges offended Batson principles.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On March 9, 1990, the victim Toni Anderson was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burkett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Cartwright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Cartwright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Cartwright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.