Legal Opinion
Patrick A. Casey, P.A., Clifford C. Gramer, Jr. And Thomas A. Simons, IV v. Joel S. Hochman, M.D. And Darrellyn S. Hochman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 8, 1992No. 90-2154PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is taken from the district court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying a discharge in bankruptcy to the defendants-appellants, Dr. Joel Hochman and Darrellyn Hochman (collectively “the Hochmans”). The only issue before us concerns whether a “Tamponator” invention, the patent therefor, and income therefrom, including payments due under a license agreement on the patent, are part of the bankruptcy estate.
I
On January 21, 1982, Dr. Joel Hochman, a psychiatrist, and his wife Darrellyn, a housewife, filed a Chapter 11 petition for bankruptcy…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Everett v. JudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Hillblom (In Re Continental Air Lines, Inc.)District Court, S.D. Texas · 1986
- Magallanes v. Williams (In Re Magallanes)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. KinzerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re: Wayne E. Bell, Jr., Debtor. Wayne E. Bell, Jr. v. Deborah BellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- In Re Winom Tool and Die, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
- In Re John Douglas SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Calder v. Job (In re Calder)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Correll v. Equifax Check Services, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.