Legal Opinion

Correll v. Equifax Check Services, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 30, 1997No. 396cv849 (JBA)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RECOMMENDED RULING [doc. 81]

ARTERTON, District Judge.

This case arises from defendant Equifax Check Services, Inc.’s (“ECS”) efforts to collect on a service charge imposed in relation to a dishonored check written by plaintiff Susan Correll and made payable to “Sports Authority.” Plaintiff claims that the methods used by defendant to collect on the check violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq., and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (“CUTPA”), Conn.Gen.Stat. § 42-110a, et seq. The parties…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rosenshein v. KlebanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  3. Seward v. DevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. DeLarco v. DeWittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Stanley v. Sherwin-Williams Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Thompson v. OrcuttSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. Rivera v. Ndola Pharmacy Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  3. Tilley v. Anixter Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  4. Calabrese v. McHughDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
  5. Farmer v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API