Correll v. Equifax Check Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RECOMMENDED RULING [doc. 81]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
This case arises from defendant Equifax Check Services, Inc.’s (“ECS”) efforts to collect on a service charge imposed in relation to a dishonored check written by plaintiff Susan Correll and made payable to “Sports Authority.” Plaintiff claims that the methods used by defendant to collect on the check violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq., and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (“CUTPA”), Conn.Gen.Stat. § 42-110a, et seq. The parties…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rosenshein v. KlebanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Seward v. DevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- DeLarco v. DeWittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Stanley v. Sherwin-Williams Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Thompson v. OrcuttSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Rivera v. Ndola Pharmacy Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Tilley v. Anixter Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Calabrese v. McHughDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Farmer v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.