Legal Opinion

Rim Group v. Mountain Mesa Uranium Corp.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1958No. 2797PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

*209OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · ParkerJustice Parker

This is an appeal from a denial of a motion to vacate a default judgment against appellant, Riverton Urani*210um Corporation, one of several defendants in a suit to quiet title to certain mining claims. It is urged that the motion should have been granted because appellant (a) had no notice of the time set for trial and (b) had a meritorious defense to the action.

Assuming, without deciding, that the setting of the case was required to be made by a formal order, we find that the record shows, and it is conceded, that the court on November 9, 1956, signed and entered an order setting the…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henderson Johnson v. Sugar Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Eager v. DerowitschWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Boulter v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Laramie Irrigation & Power Co. v. GrantWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Merryman v. School District No. 16Wyoming Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. Town of Brookfield v. Candlewood Shores Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Booth v. Magee Carpet CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Coulas v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Big Horn Rural Electric Co. v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Atkins v. Household Finance Corp. of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API