Legal Opinion

Michael Joseph Tilghman v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided June 7, 2019No. 03-17-00803-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-17-00803-CR Michael Joseph Tilghman, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 274TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. CR-16-1126, THE HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING DISSENTING OPINION While there is an expectation of privacy in a hotel room, it is well settled that the right to privacy is extinguished when a person’s right to occupy the room is terminated. Voelkel v. State,

717 S.W.2d 314, 315-16

(Tex. Crim. App. 1986) (holding no expectation of privacy during eviction). This can occur when the term…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Brimage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. United States v. Douglas Edward RamboCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  4. Voelkel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. United States v. Dusty PeoplesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API