Legal Opinion

In re Noyes

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 6, 1902No. Nos. 701, 702, 703, and 744PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The affidavit upon which the order to show cause was directed to Arthur H. Noyes charges that on July 23, 1900, said Arthur H. Noyes, as judge of the District Court of Alaska, Second Division, at Nome, Alaska, signed an order in the action entitled Chipps v. Lindeberg et al., appointing Alexander McKenzie receiver of property described in the complaint, which consisted of a placer mining claim, and enjoined the defendants, who were then in *727possession of the claim, from working the same; and on the same date made similar orders in four other similar causes pending, viz.,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. TimeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Albert B. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. In re LandauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. In Re WillisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Leber v. United States ex rel. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API