Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 3, 2006No. Record 060034PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY Senior Justice CHARLESS. RUSSELL.

This appeal requires us to construe the language of Code § 19.2-295.1 concerning bifurcated trials in criminal cases. It presents the question whether the Commonwealth may, at the sentencing stage of a bifurcated trial, present evidence of the sentences imposed upon the defendant as a part of his record of prior convictions.

Facts and Proceedings

In a jury trial, Robert Lewis Gillispie 1 was found guilty of statutory burglary. The jury fixed his punishment at five years imprisonment. After considering a pre-sentence report, the trial court imposed…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. LeVasseur v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  2. Brown v. LukhardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  3. People v. . FabianNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Cape Henry Towers, Inc. v. National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  5. Bassett v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ortiz v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  2. Andrews v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  3. Young v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  4. Structural Concrete Products, LLC v. Clarendon America InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
  5. TRAVELERS PROPERTY CAS. CO. v. ElySupreme Court of Virginia · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API