Legal Opinion
United States v. 1617 Fourth Avenue, S. W.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 28, 1976No. 1-76-Mag-1, 1-76-Mag-2PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEVITT, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on a motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(e) for the return of property seized in connection with two federal search warrants executed on December 23, 1975. The property which was seized consists in part of tablets and vials of what is believed to be amygdalin, also known as laetrile. On January 9, 1976, subsequent to the filing of this motion, movants Hanson and Schuster were indicted by the Grand Jury for the Southern District of California on charges of smuggling certain merchandise, namely vials and tablets of “amygdalin”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Daniel J. KoenigCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Fifth Avenue Peace Parade Committee v. HooverDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- United States v. LesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- William Freedman v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. NelsonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1967
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kluger v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings Involving Berkley & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
- Hanson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1976
- Pieper v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1978
- In re HerrDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.