Legal Opinion

Cache County v. Lauritzen

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 25, 1991No. 900033-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACKSON, Judge:

Cache County appeals from a decision awarding attorney fees to A.W. Lauritzen. Cache County challenges the decision on four grounds: (1) under Utah Code Ann. § 78-3a-35 (Supp.1990), a person does not have a right to court-appointed counsel in a private proceeding; (2) even if such a right exists, the juvenile court is bound by Cache County’s public defender agreement; (3) the county is not responsible for any fees resulting from court appointments made outside of the county’s agreement; and (4) the juvenile court must give the county notice of appointments made outside…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. West Jordan v. MorrisonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Gleave v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  3. American Coal Co. v. SandstromUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. SerpenteCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. Washington County v. DayUtah Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re K.A.S.Utah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. JaimezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  3. Burke v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  4. L.E.S. v. C.D.M.Utah Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State, Division of Child & Family Services v. BazzelleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API