Cache County v. Lauritzen
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACKSON, Judge:
Cache County appeals from a decision awarding attorney fees to A.W. Lauritzen. Cache County challenges the decision on four grounds: (1) under Utah Code Ann. § 78-3a-35 (Supp.1990), a person does not have a right to court-appointed counsel in a private proceeding; (2) even if such a right exists, the juvenile court is bound by Cache County’s public defender agreement; (3) the county is not responsible for any fees resulting from court appointments made outside of the county’s agreement; and (4) the juvenile court must give the county notice of appointments made outside…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- West Jordan v. MorrisonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Gleave v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
- American Coal Co. v. SandstromUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. SerpenteCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Washington County v. DayUtah Supreme Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re K.A.S.Utah Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. JaimezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- Burke v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- L.E.S. v. C.D.M.Utah Supreme Court · 2016
- State, Division of Child & Family Services v. BazzelleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.