Legal Opinion

Caines v. Marion Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 31, 1941No. 15237PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Associate Justice Fishburne.

Alleging that he swallowed a small portion of a mangled and putrified coachroach while drinking from a bottle of Coca-Cola manufactured and sold by the corporate defendant, Marion Coca-Cola Bottling Company, and retailed by the personal defendant, B. T. Dorman, on October 6, 1938, the plaintiff brought this action for the recovery of damages, actual and punitive. The Coca-Cola was purchased by the plaintiff for immediate consumption in Dorman’s store in the City of Conway. At the close of the testimony a directed verdict…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fanning v. StromanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  2. Dickson v. EppesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  3. King v. Pilot Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  4. State v. VariSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gramling v. Food MacHinery and Chemical Corp.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1957
  2. Cit. Bk. of Darlington v. McDonaldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  3. Brown v. HowellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Caines v. Marion Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  5. Collins v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API