Legal Opinion

People v. Kostal

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1954No. Crim. 5072PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Appellant Kostal was accused of robbery while armed with a deadly weapon by indictment which alleged that he had previously been convicted of robbery and had served time therefor. He pleaded guilty to th'e former conviction and, in a jury trial, was found guilty of armed robbery. He appeals from the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Defendant was represented by counsel at the trial, but represents himself on the appeal. His principal contention is that he was not sufficiently identified as one of the two men who committed the robbery. His other points relate to matters…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. LindseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. People v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. People v. McClainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. People v. WhitsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. FarringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. VisciottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. People v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. People v. ConleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. People v. VisciottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API