Legal Opinion

People v. Ross

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1960No. Crim. 3036PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Rutherford Eugene Ross was convicted by a jury of violating section 261, subdivision 1, (statutory rape) and section 288 (lewd and lascivious conduct) of the Penal Code. After the verdict of the jury was received the criminal proceedings were suspended and proceedings were had to determine whether or not Ross was a sexual psychopath. After an examination appellant was determined to be a sexual psychopath and was incarcerated as one. Thereafter a motion for a new trial was made and denied. This appeal is from an order denying the motion for a new trial. Though neither a judgment has been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. People v. ThornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. People v. HaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. FieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. SassounianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. People v. MeneleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API