Legal Opinion

Samantha a Pabst v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 19, 2015No. 14-13-00856-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice

At issue in this appeal is the propriety of a traffic stop based on the vehicle’s temporary tag being illegible from a distance of four-to-five feet. After determining the police officer reasonably suspected the driver of the vehicle had committed a violation, the trial court denied appellant’s motion to suppress evidence stemming from the traffic stop. We affirm.

I. Factual and PROCEDURAL Background

Appellant Samantha A. Pabst was driving a vehicle with a temporary tag. Officer Tida Liu found the tag illegible and initiated a traffic stop. As a result of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Wiede v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. Broxton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Penton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. David Lee Jackson v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2025
  3. Gregorio Moreno v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2016
  4. James Lee Skinner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2016
  5. James Lee Skinner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API