Samantha a Pabst v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice
At issue in this appeal is the propriety of a traffic stop based on the vehicle’s temporary tag being illegible from a distance of four-to-five feet. After determining the police officer reasonably suspected the driver of the vehicle had committed a violation, the trial court denied appellant’s motion to suppress evidence stemming from the traffic stop. We affirm.
I. Factual and PROCEDURAL Background
Appellant Samantha A. Pabst was driving a vehicle with a temporary tag. Officer Tida Liu found the tag illegible and initiated a traffic stop. As a result of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Wiede v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Broxton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Penton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- David Lee Jackson v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2025
- Gregorio Moreno v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2016
- James Lee Skinner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2016
- James Lee Skinner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.