Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Henson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 29, 1982No. 29817, CA A24588PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

The issue is whether the notice of appeal is timely filed. Respondent contends that it is not, because it was filed 36 days after “entry” of the judgment by the clerk. Appellant, relying on ORCP 70B(1), argues that the time commences to run when the judgment appealed from is “docketed” in the judgment docket. If the judgment was entered1 on April 8, 1982, the notice of appeal is timely filed. The narrow issue is the meaning of “entry of the judgment” contained in ORS 19.026(1), which provides:

“Except as provided in subsections (2) and (3) of this section, the notice of appeal shall be served…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Charco, Inc. v. CohnOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Appleton v. Oregon Iron & Steel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Blackledge v. HarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Neal v. HaightOregon Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. PanichelloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. League of Women Voters v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Garcia v. Oregon Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Simpson v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Simpson v. SimpsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API