Legal Opinion

Automated Facilities Mgt. Corp. V. Smartware Group, et al.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided October 21, 2013No. 12-CV-327-PBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Automated Facilities Management Corporation v. Case N o . 12-cv-327-PB Opinion N o .

2013 DNH 138

Smartware Group, Inc., et a l . MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Automated Facilities Management Corporation (“AFMC”), the exclusive licensee for United States Patent Nos. 7,548,970 and 7,606,919 (the “‘970 Patent” and “‘919 Patent,” respectively), has sued Smartware Group, Inc., for patent infringement. Smartware has responded with a counterclaim against AFMC and a third-party complaint against Tangopoint, Inc., seeking a declaratory judgment of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Beverly Hills Fan Company v. Royal Sovereign Corp. And Ultec Enterprises Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. Red Wing Shoe Company, Inc. v. Hockerson-Halberstadt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. The Akro Corporation v. Ken LukerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API