Legal Opinion

Thirlwell v. Hines

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1921No. 22,882PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Linn district court; Edward C. Gates, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The plaintiff sued to recover a fire loss. The jury found against .him, and the court granted a new trial on account of certain instructions given, and from this order the defendant appeals. .

Three principal questions arise: The effect of a certain spur-track contract, the correctness and materiality of certain instructions, and the propriety of granting a new trial.

After pleading the usual defenses in a fire case, the defendant set up a contract to build a spur track on the line of which "the property burned was located. This contract was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Insurance v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Griswold v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Mann v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Griffiths Grain Co. v. St. Joseph & Grand Island Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Thomason v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Talley v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. OlveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  3. Riddle Quarries, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  4. Anderson v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
  5. Niederhaus v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API