Legal Opinion

In re Robertson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 16, 2009No. 2009-B-1353PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*1187ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.*

11 This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Darryl L. Robertson, an attorney hcensed to practice law in Louisiana.

UNDERLYING FACTS

The underlying facts of this matter are not in dispute, having been stipulated to by the parties.

In June 2005, Glen Brown hired respondent on a contingency basis to represent him in a claim against his employer, whom he alleged released his confidential medical information without his authorization. In September 2005, respondent filed a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re RobertsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API