Legal Opinion

Paulson v. Babich

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1930No. 22731. Department OnePublished

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— The original complaint of respondent in this action was upon an account stated for the recovery of $697.69. After answer by appellant, which alleged certain new matter by way of confession and avoidance, respondent, apparently assuming that the issues under his original complaint might be too narrowly stated, filed and served an amended complaint, setting forth the facts giving rise to his claim in the same exact sum. To this amended complaint, appellant answered, averring certain new matter, again by way of confession and avoidance, and also cross-complained against respondent for alleged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Distler v. DabneyWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Clemmons v. McGeerWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Osten v. WinehillWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Smart v. BurquoinWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Perlus v. Market Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API