Legal Opinion

Estate of Henderson

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1936No. Civ. 10083PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This appeal involves the question of judicial power to enforce testamentary directions as to the place and manner of burial of a decedent’s remains as against the contrary wishes of a sole surviving sister, who is the next of kin.

The facts out of which the controversy arises are as follows: The testatrix, Mrs. Katherine C. Henderson, a widow, died testate on March 12, 1921, leaving an estate in excess of the value of $390,000. She was one of several surviving children of Mr. and Mrs. F. A. Hihn, pioneer settlers of Santa Cruz. Her husband, H. 0. Henderson, and her only child, as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Yome v. GormanNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Pettigrew v. PettigrewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Duffill v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. O'Donnell v. SlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Enos v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newman v. SathyavaglswaranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Serrano v. JimenezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Bruning v. Eckman Funeral HomeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  4. Newman ex rel. Newman v. SathyavaglswaranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API