Legal Opinion
Graham v. Honeywell International Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 22, 2025No. 3:23-cv-04865Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MAXWELL A GRAHAM, Case No. 23-cv-04865-RFL Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 76-77 Defendant. The parties do not dispute the following facts. Honeywell hired Maxwell Graham as a sales manager in 2019. Two years later, as part of a reorganization, the company instructed him to reapply or else he would lose his job. Graham negotiated a higher salary and incentive compensation that he could earn under the company’s Sales Incentive Plans…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Fraser v. GoodaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Gary E. Wallis, Husband Carol Wallis, Wife v. J.R. Simplot CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Kathleen Sonner v. Premier Nutrition Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.