Legal Opinion

Wilkinson v. K-Mart

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1992No. 01941PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order entered on May 22,1991 granting appellee K-Mart Corporation’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing all claims against K-Mart with prejudice. Appellants, Harry and Patricia Wilkinson, raise the following issues:

The Court of Common Pleas improperly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment as there exists numerous unresolved material factual issues.

K-Mart argues that by giving directions to Harry Wilkinson and controlling his day to day operations it employs Harry Wilkinson as a “borrowed servant.” However caselaw confirms that Harry…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Penn Center House, Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Mature v. AngeloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. O'NEILL v. Checker Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. English v. Lehigh County AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. McCain v. PennbankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. JFC Temps, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Shamis v. James Moon C/O Geppert Brothers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. J.L. Nagle. v. TrueBlue, Inc., Labor Ready, Inc. and Labor Ready Northeast, Inc. and Rye Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Mullins v. Sun Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Burrell, B. v. Streamlight, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API