Board of Supervisors of Elections v. Smallwood
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partChasanow, Judge
The issue decided by the trial courts in the instant case was whether the proposed cap amendments violate Article *251XI-A of the Maryland Constitution. The courts below answered that question in the affirmative, and this Court reverses that determination. I concur in Parts I through III of the Court’s opinion.
In Part IV, the majority coins the pejorative phrases— “roll backs” and “escape clauses”—and decides that roll backs as well as escape clauses violate a section of the Tax-Property Article and are therefore void. The majority goes on to rewrite the amendments petitioned for by over 20,000…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schneider v. LansdaleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Anne Arundel County v. McDonoughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Rivergate Rest. Corp. v. METRO. DADE CTY.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- City of Takoma Park v. Citizens for Decent GovernmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Cassese v. City Clerk of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.