Munster v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying relief on Robert Munster’s application for post-conviction relief. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Munster’s application for post-conviction relief stems from his conviction and imprisonment for lewd and lascivious conduct with a child under sixteen, I.C. § 18-1508. Munster appealed in that case, challenging the denial of his motion for reduction of his sentence. The underlying facts and proce dural history of the criminal action are described in this Court’s unpublished…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- Roman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. BearshieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- LaBelle v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997