Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Stevenson v. Kirkpatrick

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 21, 1976No. 59529Published

1DissentBardgett, Judge

I respectfully dissent. In my opinion there is no statutory authority for a county of the second class to elect a prosecuting attorney for a two-year term nor is there any authority found in section 56.010 that authorizes a county of the second class to elect a prosecuting attorney in any years other than 1974 and at four-year intervals thereafter.

The counties involved in this case were third-class counties at the time of the 1974 general election. Pursuant to 56.010, a prosecuting attorney was elected in each of these counties to “hold . . . office for two years, and until his successor is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. RansonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  2. State ex rel. Tredway v. LuskSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  3. State ex rel. Stevenson v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  4. State ex rel. Robinson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  5. State Ex Rel. v. Brown and BarnettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API