Legal Opinion

People v. Vargas

California Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1973No. Crim. 16541PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BURKE, J.

Defendant appeals from a conviction of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211) following trial by jury. He asserts that prejudicial error occurred at trial, namely, two separate violations of the rule which forbids any adverse comment upon the exercise of his right to .remain silent at trial. (See Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 [14 L.Ed.2d 106, 85 S.Ct. 1229].) We have concluded that although Griffin error occurred, that error was harmless beyond all reasonable doubt, in view of the relatively minor nature of the error and the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt. Accordingly,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. People v. HastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. People v. MirandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. GhentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. ClairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API