Osterhus v. King Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court reopening a default judgment entered against defendant Harry F. De-Ziel, Jr., on September 17, 1956. Neither King Construction Company nor Ray J. Rech appears or is involved in the present appeal.
Plaintiff commenced this action August 10, 1956, against the corporate defendant and the two individual defendants. The complaint alleged that plaintiff performed certain work, labor, and services and provided materials for the defendants and that “there remains due and owing” the sum of $3,902.23. The complaint…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sommers v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Edler v. HascheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Whipple v. MahlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- National Council of Knights and Ladies of Security v. CanterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Hersey v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lange v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Heiskell v. H. C. Enterprise, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Heiskell v. H. C. Enterprise, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968