Arotzky v. Kropnitzky
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, J.
The suit was on a check given in part purchase of an automobile sold and delivered, of which check the maker, appellant, stopped payment. Appellant also counterclaimed for the part of the price actually paid on the ground *345that there had been a warranty broken. The trial, court held that there had been no warranty, rejected the counter-claim, and gave judgment for plaintiff on the check.
The particular feature of the case is that when the automobile was sold, no bill of sale was delivered with it as required by the act of 1919 {Pamph. L., p.…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Braham & Co. v. Steinard-Hannon Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Infante v. GottesmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Greene v. BirkmeyerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Hento v. MelmerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Naylor v. ConroyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.